Comments on: Who dares draw?

By: el wehbi

el wehbi — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:54:52 +0000

Bash: I don’t think there was a lot more that could have been done. Bringing on Gudjohnsen could have been a catalyst, but I’m not sure it if it was necessary. As far as Harry having to learn to change up tactics during the match, I couldn’t agree with you more.

JimmyG2: I thought Crouchie did a great job with the headers in this match. It just wasn’t going our way. I just hope we can play every upcoming fixture in the same manner. Then I can truly say we have a great shot at the 4th spot.

COYS!

By: JimmyG2

JimmyG2 — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:38:52 +0000

I thought that Crouch played well and managed to direct more headers to our players than usual. Harry has come unstuck once or twice with substitutions lately and as he did at Leeds he left it alone.
Good performance shame about the result. I’m copywriting that for our end of term post mortem.

By: Bash

Bash — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 22:01:48 +0000

I know the team bossed the game against a supposedly quality team. But what’s the deference between this result and the ones we got against other lower quality opposition and we couldn’t score and open the team up. The same problem still exists, park the bus and you wont lose in WHL. Either we as a team cant learn or Harry doesn’t know how to deal with that strategy. Maybe we can get a reserve coach to come in for Harry in those games late on.

Still believe that a sub might of changed the game. some people are saying that he didn’t want to change the rhythm as we were controlling the game. But a change of plan was needed. We couldn’t score so the rhythm wasn’t working.

Cant wait for Lennon to come back, Him and bale Hmm.. had a dream about that game.